When I first went to Nursing School 6 years ago, I remember meeting so many idealistic nurses to be with dreams of taking their education and going to work overseas to make a difference in countries less fortunate than our own. Their experiences as Peace Corp Volunteers and NGO employees sounded so noble and exotic to me and I felt somehow inferior for having chosen to become a nurse without consideration for how my knowledge could benefit those living in areas without access to care at a fundamental level.
We undoubtedly have an incredible wealth of resources within our health care system from beautiful hospitals and clinics with multi million dollar architectural features to state of the art medical equipment, computer services, and highly educated medical personnel compared to health care systems in other countries. For example, it is unheard of in this country for a medical facility to have such a shortage of supplies that medical personnel would have no gloves available to wear when handling blood and body fluids or have to wash out the same pair of gloves repeatedly in between patients. When one considers how vastly privileged we are in this country, it is hard not to feel alternatively grateful for our own fortune and disgusted that we have so much when others have so little.
After 5 years of working as a Registered Nurse in pediatric and adult emergency rooms in New Orleans as well as in Pediatric Hematology Oncology at a nationally ranked pediatric hospital, I have come to understand how social, economic and cultural factors interact with one another in our health care environments that illustrate vast inequalities among patients within our own systems of health care.
The divide between the experience of the wealthy and the poor in this country is well documented. If you asked any medical professional if they treat all their patients the same regardless of their race, class, gender, or cultural background most would answer with conviction that they provide the same care to everyone. As individuals caring for patients, I know how deeply we believe that we treat patient equally. At the same time, if we acknowledge and examine all the ways in which the health care system is designed from corporate insurance policies to how our implementation of particular policies in hospitals and clinics may exclude patients who speak languages other than English, we would be forced to admit how our systems are defined to produce and affirm inequality that is defined by differences in race, class, and cultural background.
Too often we understand the concept equality to mean that everyone is treated exactly the same. This construct itself is what produces and supports inquality. Treating people the same way for the same conditions adheres to this notion of equality but in essence illustrates a failure to understand and address how differences in socio-economic and socio-cultural identities change the way people interface with social institutions such as health care. Imagine a pediatrician who sees two children on the same day in the same office, each wih a complaint of fever. Upon examination, the provider finds that both children have bilateral ear infections. Amoxil is prescribed. Two weeks later, one family returns with the same complaint and the provider examines the chil to find that his ear infections have not improved. The provider is concerned. It would seem that the second family spoke Spanish. The provider used an interpreter to explain the prescription the first time and cannot understand why they did not treat their child as he instructed. As it turns out, this family spoke only a little Spanish, they first language is a tribal Guatemalan dialect. In addition, they could not afford the prescription because they do not have insurance and are not eligible for Medicaid because they are in this country illegally. They did not tell the provider because they feared deportation. Finally, neither parent in this family completed education beyond 6th grade level in their home country.
Of course many providers address these issues successfully on a daily basis, however, there are numerous examples of how our awareness of these issues is not heightened until our attempt to treat patients the same fails. This is a process of trial and error in many provider experiences. If a situation is urgent enough or for cases of complicated management of chronic conditions, however, we may not have the luxury of trial and error. Also the difference economically for a family with access to insurance and without is crucial. Most providers have few options to provide the same treatment to families living below the poverty line who must bear the financial burden of treatment themselves. In effect, the differences between how these families and their upper middle class counterparts with insurance and large disposable incomes access medical care and treatment are astounding. Our health care system is designed to provide them the same treatment in theory, but not in practice.
In my own practice as a nurse, I have come to understand that even my best efforts to provide all children with the same care is severely limited within the health care system at times due in part to my own lac of understanding of the social, cultural or economic realities of my patients. I do believe that our resources are vast enough to decrease many inequalities, though complete elimination of inequality is perhaps unrealistic.
I propose that medical professionals must first define the scope of the problem through research. Let us begin to expand our studies of disease outcomes to include data about insurance status, primary language, family income, and cultural background.
Once such data is collected, we can begin to design interventions that will address the specific needs of families with different backgrounds. No doubt the need for health care policy change will be a highlight of such efforts, but we must also focus our interventions to find the most effective ways to treat, teach, and monitor families on the most basic level of how each provider interacts with each patient. We may find that shifting our thought processes away from notions of equal treatment and towards different treatments for different basic human needs is a philosophical shift that produces profound results.